Town & Country

This topic submitted by Melissa Raftery Nikki Rudnick Brandy McQueary (mcqueabj@muohio.edu) at 3:16 pm on 2/28/01. Additions were last made on Monday, April 9, 2001. Section: Cummins.



Introduction
The intention of this research is to compare social tendencies of individuals in the city, country, and suburban areas of the Mid-West. Does location allow the individual to become more or less self-forgetful? Does it make a difference where one was raised? Or is the current location more of the issue?
In Richard Wright’s opinion the size of your town does make a difference because you will be looking out more for yourself, your past, and your future. “There are at least two reasons integrity and honesty make particular sense in a small and social setting. One is that (as everyone who has lived in a small town knows) there’s no escaping your past. … A second reason why being nice is so fruitful in a place like Shrewsbury is that the people you’re nice to will be around for a long time” (Wright 220). People in small towns are more altruistic because you are continuously confronted with reacquiring issues daily, such as relationships, social status and current events.
Upon taking the train into New York City my mother forewarned me for the sixth time, “Remember, don’t look anyone in the eye.” In analyzing this statement, we realize the stereotypical view of city people is that they have an agenda, do not desire it to be interrupted, and looking a person in the eye would be all together too personal and inviting. On addressing the urban populations Richard Wright writes, “To some extent, this analysis simply underscores the old truisms about the effects of urban anonymity: New Yorkers are rude, and New York is full of pickpockets.” If the stereotypical idea of New Yorkers is true, will there even be any participants willing to take our survey? If so, will city people prove concern for any peoples other than themselves?
Pop culture dictates that the big city environment is grossly lacking in morals and values, in comparison to the high levels of ethics down on the farm. Our research intends to prove that social tendencies have little to do with issues of morality; and focus more on issues of necessity. This research can be accomplished through intensive fieldwork, surveying the public, and in depth study of a range social sciences.

Relevance of your research question

Our research will touch on basic issues of kindness in the world. We hope to gain an idea for what the actual purpose is behind altruistic behavior, and determine if people are this way based solely on self-motivation or if there are other things behind this behavior. We want to witness and document people’s behavior on a very basic level that could be applied on a much larger scale. Any conclusions about the necessities of congeniality in a social setting will lead us into discovery of why people are the way that they are, and how individuals are influenced by social settings. We would like to determine if morals and values are truly that different depending on where you are from and/or where you were raised. This research will let us know where individuals feel that they stand with one another in social settings, and it makes us aware of our own motivations in relationships. The topics that we are investigating can be applied to small-scale issues as well as society at large. This form of altruism gives insight to the bigger picture, and ground level research may help in proving or disproving its existence.

Materials and Methods

Initial steps in research mostly surround starting with general exploration on the subject areas of social psychology, evolutionary biology, and anthropology. More specifically it will be beneficial to peruse what kinds of experiments and studies have been conducted surrounding altruism. In the last decades the social sciences have become concerned with what means location plays in attitude, Wright has offered many sources to start with, and we have found some of our own.

1. Badcock, C.R. The Problem of Altruism. New York: Basil Blackwell, Inc., 1986.
2. Cartwright, John. Evolution and Human Behavior. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000.
3. Ozinga, James R. Altruism. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 1999.
4. Pogrebin, Letty Cottin. Among Friends. United States: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1987.
5. Ridley, Matt. The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Penguin Books, 1996.
6. Wildavsky, Aaron. Culture and Social Theory. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1998.

After a general background of environmental consequences has been covered the next step is to survey the public at large. As a group we intend to travel to three urban, three suburban, and three rural community settings. Proposed locations at this point are: Cincinnati, Indianapolis, and Chicago for the urban environments, West Chester, Anderson and Dayton for a suburban setting, and for the rural arena we intend to visit Greenville, Oxford, and Eaton. Once on location the plan of action is to distribute as certain number of surveys over a given number of time. Data will be collected in two ways from the surveys. First it will be calculated and documented how many people were approached to fill out the surveys and how many people actually did so. A comparison will be made from the different venues concerning how willing participants were in the study. The survey it self will consist of only one question, a moral dilemma will be posed. For example, If you saw a person drop a twenty-dollar bill on the ground, and you had the opportunity to give it back, would you do so? This section of data will hypothetically give us the prospect to contrast the differing moral or ethic reactions of town and country. The advantage of having a duel purpose in our survey will allow us to gain access to both avenues of values and patience.
In addition, we intend to create a video from our experiences in the varying community settings to show the class. We feel that pictures at times are worth a thousand words, and since we will have had the opportunity to see first hand the differing reactions in public settings we feel the class should have the same opportunity.

Discussion and Conclusion

We hypothesis that the mentality of individuals growing up in a city environment will differ greatly from the mentality of individuals growing up in a small town surrounding. We believe that there will be an obvious correlation in the data that we collect showing differences between big city values and small town values. Neither of these groups’ beliefs are considered more acceptable by society, but each heavily argues for its lifestyle being on a higher moral ground. Are there any relations between these settings what are the differences? We predict that in small towns people will be more cordial toward one another and more prone to conversation, based on Wright's thoughts that we are more apt to be nice to people we will encounter again. In big cities we will see very little interactions due to the large populations. Natural selection has given us the ability to adapt and we have different reasons for doing things. People that live in small towns are not just more nice because of their personalities, but because of the necessity.

Timeline

Week of March 4: Printing surveys, conducting preliminary research, and gathering materials and data.

Week of March 11: Spring Break: Jamaica + Panama City!!

Week of March 18: Trip to Cincinnati areas, suburban and city. Survey distribution.

Week of March 25: Brandy’s Birthday! Friends coming from Bowling Green.

Week of April 1: April Fools Day! Tricks on you!

Week of April 8: Trip to Indianapolis and Chicago, city. Survey distribution.

Week of April 15: Trip to Greenville, Eaton, and Oxford, small towns. Survey distribution.

Week of April 22: Melissa’s Birthday! Watch out Oxford! Analyze data.

Next Article
Previous Article
Return to the Topic Menu


Here is a list of responses that have been posted to this Study...

IMPORTANT: Press the Browser Reload button to view the latest contribution.

Respond to this Submission!

IMPORTANT: For each Response, make sure the title of the response is different than previous titles shown above!

Response Title:
Author(s):

E-Mail:
Professor's Name (Choose either Cummins or Myers):
Optional: For Further Info on this Topic, Check out this WWW Site:
Response Text:



Article complete. Click HERE to return to the Human Nature Menu.

Visit the rest of the site!

Site NAVIGATION--Table of Contents

Listen to a "Voice Navigation" Intro! (Quicktime or MP3)

Google
Search WWW WITHIN-SITE Keyword Search!!

WEATHER & EARTH SCIENCE RESOURCES

TROPICAL ECOSYSTEM FIELD COURSES

Hays' Tarantula Page| Ohio Bird Photo Collection | Tropical Bird Collection | Costa Rica Image Collection | Hays' Marine Ecology Images and Movies |Local Watershed Fish Studies| Wildflowers, Arthropods, ETC in SW Ohio | Earth Science Resources | Astronomy Links | Global Change | Marine Ecology "Creature Study Guide" |

OTHER ACADEMIC COURSES, STUDENT RESEARCH, OTHER STUFF

| Educational Philosophy | Discovery Labs: Moon, Geologic Time, Sun, Taxonomy, Frisbee | Project Dragonfly | Vita |Field Course Postings | Student Research Postings | Nature/Science Autobiography | Environmental Programs at Miami University

TEACHING TOOLS & OTHER STUFF

Daily Necessities: Macintosh Resources |Search Engines | Library Resources|Server Stats| Family Album | View My Schedule | View Guestbook | Western College "Multimedia Potpourri"